The UNIT Party – Unity, Initiative, Tradition informs the public about the intervention filed against our registration process by Aurora-Tasica Simu and Andrei Csillag, currently serving as Members of the Romanian Parliament.
Their intervention, submitted without legal basis and without any legitimate interest, raises serious questions regarding the true motivation behind this action.
Facts. Legal Reality. Evidence.
- The UNIT Party has been founded and documented since 29 May 2025, with:
- a recorded founding meeting;
- the domain name purchased;
- the initial constitutional documents prepared;
- legal counsel engaged from the very beginning.
- The political initiative supported by the two MPs appears only at the end of June, with no priority, no overlap, and no connection whatsoever to the UNIT project.
- Romanian law protects the full official name of a political party, not abbreviations or common-use acronyms.
The acronym “UNIT” may be legitimately used by any political formation that defines its own identity around it.
Despite this, the two MPs chose to ignore both the law and the real chronology, filing an intervention without evidence, without justification, and without any legal coherence.
A Familiar Pattern?
It is important to remind the public of one undeniable, publicly documented fact:
Both MPs left the party that promoted them, supported them, and brought them into Parliament.
Regardless of the explanations they offered, their departure is widely perceived as a rupture of loyalty toward the political structure that secured their parliamentary positions.
Without judging their personal choices, this phenomenon naturally raises questions about political stability and consistency.
Seen in this context, a pattern becomes visible:
leaving the very project that empowered them, followed by an attempt to obstruct a project that does not belong to them.
UNIT is not interested in personal disputes.
But facts, when viewed together, paint a picture that cannot be ignored.
Coordination or Coincidence?
Their intervention cannot be justified by:
- any form of prejudice,
- any real confusion,
- any violation of rights,
- any doctrinal overlap.
There is absolutely no logical or legal reason for two MPs, completely unrelated to our project, to be concerned with the existence of the UNIT Party.
This naturally leads to several legitimate questions:
Is this a personal initiative, or part of a broader coordinated strategy?
Who stands to gain from delaying or obstructing the registration of UNIT?
Why would the emergence of a transparent, legally sound political project pose a threat?
We make no accusations.
We do not speculate without proof.
However, the timing, insistence, and lack of justification suggest the possibility of external influences driving this action.
UNIT Moves Forward — Despite All Pressure and Obstacles
UNIT remains firmly committed to:
- legality,
- transparency,
- institutional respect,
- and public accountability.
No baseless intervention can stop a political project built on evidence, integrity, and the genuine commitment of its members.
UNIT cannot be blocked by unfounded maneuvers.
Whatever interests lie behind these attempts, time and the law will deliver the final answer.
